
Amy Chua’s new book has raised a lot of attention lately. An excerpt from Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother ran in the Wall Street Journal recently, titled "Why Chinese Mothers are Superior."
I’m guessing most readers of this blog subscribe to an authoritative parenting style. I do my best to be authoritative with my kids and do not consider myself an indulgent or authoritarian parent. Everything I’ve read about the book indicates that Amy Chua (aka, Tiger Mother) subscribes to an authoritarian parenting style.
A quick review of these three popular parenting styles:
Parents generally fall into one of three categories: authoritarian (telling their children exactly what to do), indulgent (allowing their children to do whatever they wish), or authoritative (providing rules and guidance without being overbearing)*
*Taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parenting_styles
Here are some insights about Amy Chua’s book from Po Bronson, co-author of Nurture Shock:
“I just couldn't endorse the book… Not because Amy Chua admits to insulting and guilting her daughters constantly ... and not because Amy Chua deprives her kids of playdates and sleepovers ... and not because Amy disses athletics and drama. Rather, I couldn't endorse it because too much of the book felt like braggadocio about how great her daughters were at piano and violin. Hey, we all do it ... we take immense pride when our kids do well ... some of that pride slips out now and then, absolutely ... but a whole book predicated on children's superiority made me uncomfortable.”
When I read Po Bronson’s and other’s reviews of Tiger Mother I couldn’t help but wonder what percentage of the school age population this book applies to.
In my opinion, Tiger Mother is preaching to an elite group of parents, giving advice to a minute percentage of the population who are wealthy and highly educated, like her own family (I’m guessing, look at the picture above).
As long as parents know she is giving advice to this small, select group, that’s fine. And, yes, her strict tactics will work and her children will become accomplished at tasks they practice 3-4 hours per day. But I worry when her elite standard becomes the standard for the majority of the school age population.
Of the approximately 63 million school-aged children in the US how many have the same advantages (wealth & education) that the Chuas have? How many are above average intellectually? How many are average? How many are below average?
I’m guessing the majority of those 63 million students fall into the intellectually “average” category. As measured by standardized tests, I am intellectually average, as are my children and (I’m still guessing) most of the students at my children’s schools.
Yet, I see many U.S. suburban and urban public schools setting standards for the majority of their students that are attainable to a select few. Look at what is now required to enroll in a University of California school, for example. Teenagers must have a full resume to even consider applying to a UC school – a high GPA combined with many extra curricular and community service activities. (Listen to a recent NPR interview here about stressed high school kids on Tell Me More.)
It’s perfectly fine and necessary to set high goals and standards for ourselves and for our children. That will keep us on the path to life long learning. But, if we are always looking at the outcome or performance, we will miss the process and the journey.
It is also perfectly fine to accept ourselves as we are, and realize that sometimes good (or average) is good enough.
Or, as Claire Dederer says in Poser : “It might be nice to take incredible off the menu for a while and just enjoy ordinary.”